Controlled Foreign Corporation (CFC) Tax Issues and Compliance
Comprehensive guide to Controlled Foreign Corporation (CFC) tax rules, Subpart F income, and how to navigate CFC compliance requirements with the IRS.
Controlled Foreign Corporations (CFCs) are subject to complex US tax rules under Subpart F of the Internal Revenue Code. Understanding these rules is critical for taxpayers with foreign business interests.
What is a Controlled Foreign Corporation?
A CFC is a foreign corporation that is more than 50% owned (by vote or value) by US shareholders on any day during the taxable year. A US shareholder is defined as a US person who owns at least 10% of the foreign corporation's voting stock.
Subpart F Income
Subpart F income includes various types of income that are generally subject to immediate US taxation, even if not distributed to shareholders. This includes:
- Foreign personal holding company income (FPHCI)
- Foreign base company income
- Insurance income
- Certain oil-related income
Recent Tax Court Developments
Recent Tax Court decisions have provided important guidance on CFC taxation and compliance requirements. These cases help clarify the application of Subpart F rules in complex international structures.
Compliance Requirements
Taxpayers with CFC interests must comply with various reporting requirements, including:
- Form 5471 (Information Return of U.S. Persons With Respect To Certain Foreign Corporations)
- Annual information reporting
- Proper documentation of transactions
Need Help with CFC Issues?
If you have questions about CFC taxation or are facing an IRS audit related to foreign corporations, we can help. Contact us to discuss your specific situation.
Communications are not protected by attorney client privilege until such relationship with an attorney is formed.
Related Featured Analysis
Penalty Assessability after Mukhi
The Mukhi case requires that penalties be explicitly assessable as a tax by statute. If the penalty is not marked as assessable by statute, then the IRS must sue civilly to collect the penalty. This analysis examines every penalty and whether it is explicitly marked as assessable by statute.
3M case, 8th Circuit says: "Statutes trump regulations", Applies Loper Bright, and Rejects IRS Position
In a landmark reversal, the Eighth Circuit ruled that the IRS cannot tax income that a taxpayer is legally prohibited from receiving, delivering a major blow to the agency's reallocation authority under Section 482.
Criminal Tax Prosecutions Involving Cryptocurrency: A Comprehensive Case Analysis
An in-depth examination of criminal tax cases involving cryptocurrency and digital assets, including prosecution arguments, defense strategies, and unique case facts. This resource aggregates all known criminal tax prosecutions related to cryptocurrency.
Related Topics
TaxCourtBlog
The Tax Court Blog provides in-depth US tax court analysis, expert commentary on IRS court cases, and insights for tax professionals and taxpayers.
Grantor Trusts vs Non-Grantor Trusts: Tax Treatment and Asset Protection
Understanding the critical distinction between grantor and non-grantor trusts, their tax consequences, and the factual elements that determine classification. This guide explores the tradeoffs between tax treatment and asset protection.
Intentionally Defective Grantor Trust (IDGT): Purpose and Implementation
Understanding Intentionally Defective Grantor Trusts (IDGTs), their purpose in estate planning, and how they are structured to achieve both estate tax exclusion and income tax advantages while maintaining asset protection benefits.